Arco Consumer Brands acts on school trips too expensive
ARCO Consumer Brands urges all school authorities to more thoroughly assess, in periods of serious economic hardship for families, the mode of the current school trips. Often prove too expensive and lacking in price / quality of services and educational utility, making it only a big deal for haulage companies, travel agencies etc. .. By the way the phenomenon of school trips is degenerating into dilation of time spent and costs, subjecting families to a great psychological pressure to make even join their children. ARC believes that a lack of sensitivity on the part of schools that practice, which adversely affected their economic interests and inadequate teaching that would therefore sostenere.ARCO sent to the Minister of Education requesting a moderator on a point of intervention to a greater awareness to carry calls and spending proposals aimed primarily at all those guys who because of their young age are more vulnerable but at the same time capable to implement real psychological blackmail and guilt cause to families.
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Best Blu Ray Player For Non-hdmi Receiver
SYSTEMS IN BUILDINGS HOUSING CONSUMER BRANDS clarifies the ARC ' INCOGNITA
The Arc Consumer Brands, the voice of the Regional President Andrea Calvaresi, brings clarity to users on the much debated and criticized the decree "on the retrofitting of equipment in housing units." Dm The decree 37/08, which has aroused great concern and indignation on the part of homeowners, imposes an obligation to guarantee those who sell a building or portion thereof, to certify the retrofit of all plants and a requirement for delivery of documents to the purchaser or tenant of the property. And if there is no matching certificate for the boiler, the water pipes, telephone cables or antenna TV what happens? No fear of compromise or deed, do all you can arrange an agreement between the parties.
Indeed, to our demands, the ministry has repeatedly stated that:
1. The term "facility under" must be understood in the sense of a plant in accordance with the rules in force at the time the facility was constructed or modified (and then for plants "outdated" by supervening legislation, there is no obligation to upgrade);
2. the guarantee obligation (which is mandatory when a property is sold brand new) in other cases, exceptions, in the sense that if the facility is not in accordance with, the house is unsold and the seller is not necessarily required to make them conform. In fact, if the purchaser intends to also make the purchase of goods with non-compliant systems, he may exempt the seller from the obligation to provide facilities in accordance with and to produce certificates of compliance;
3. the obligation of attaching a certificate of compliance the contract of sale or the obligation to deliver these documents to the tenant may be disregarded, if an agreement to that effect between the parties.
The fact remains that the Decree 37/08, as "Il Sole 24 Ore" was expected from early reviews, has resulted in the world of real estate trading indisputable alarmism (so that you continue to talk often, though unjustifiably, real estate unsaleable or not up to standard as non-transferable leased). The decree has led to the division of the market especially in two quite distinct groups: one made of "virtuous", with facilities in accordance with, and that of buildings with non-certified facilities, already become, in a few days, second-class buildings, and thus exempt from the "contractual right" and exposed to writedowns.
The Arc Consumer Brands, the voice of the Regional President Andrea Calvaresi, brings clarity to users on the much debated and criticized the decree "on the retrofitting of equipment in housing units." Dm The decree 37/08, which has aroused great concern and indignation on the part of homeowners, imposes an obligation to guarantee those who sell a building or portion thereof, to certify the retrofit of all plants and a requirement for delivery of documents to the purchaser or tenant of the property. And if there is no matching certificate for the boiler, the water pipes, telephone cables or antenna TV what happens? No fear of compromise or deed, do all you can arrange an agreement between the parties.
Indeed, to our demands, the ministry has repeatedly stated that:
1. The term "facility under" must be understood in the sense of a plant in accordance with the rules in force at the time the facility was constructed or modified (and then for plants "outdated" by supervening legislation, there is no obligation to upgrade);
2. the guarantee obligation (which is mandatory when a property is sold brand new) in other cases, exceptions, in the sense that if the facility is not in accordance with, the house is unsold and the seller is not necessarily required to make them conform. In fact, if the purchaser intends to also make the purchase of goods with non-compliant systems, he may exempt the seller from the obligation to provide facilities in accordance with and to produce certificates of compliance;
3. the obligation of attaching a certificate of compliance the contract of sale or the obligation to deliver these documents to the tenant may be disregarded, if an agreement to that effect between the parties.
The fact remains that the Decree 37/08, as "Il Sole 24 Ore" was expected from early reviews, has resulted in the world of real estate trading indisputable alarmism (so that you continue to talk often, though unjustifiably, real estate unsaleable or not up to standard as non-transferable leased). The decree has led to the division of the market especially in two quite distinct groups: one made of "virtuous", with facilities in accordance with, and that of buildings with non-certified facilities, already become, in a few days, second-class buildings, and thus exempt from the "contractual right" and exposed to writedowns.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)